{
 "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1.1",
 "title": "masci banks: all CVE events",
 "home_page_url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/products/masci--banks/",
 "feed_url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/feeds/products/masci--banks/all.json",
 "authors": [
  {
   "name": "Patchwire"
  }
 ],
 "language": "en",
 "items": [
  {
   "id": "tag:patchwire.jonathanross.dev,2026:CVE-2026-107717/disclosed",
   "url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/cve/CVE-2026-107717/",
   "title": "CVE-2026-107717 · masci banks · disclosed",
   "content_text": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. Prior to 2.5.0, Banks Prompt.chat_messages() attempts to parse every line of rendered template output as ChatMessage JSON. When an application renders untrusted data and passes the returned ChatMessage objects to an LLM provider, attacker-controlled JSON can cross the prompt boundary and become a system, assistant, or tool message because ChatMessage.role accepts arbitrary strings. This can override application instructions, alter the intended prompt structure, or confuse downstream tool and message handling. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.0.",
   "date_published": "2026-10-08T21:38:07Z"
  },
  {
   "id": "tag:patchwire.jonathanross.dev,2026:CVE-2026-107717/fixed/pypi",
   "url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/cve/CVE-2026-107717/",
   "title": "CVE-2026-107717 · masci banks · fixed upstream (PyPI)",
   "content_text": "Fixed versions: banks 2.5.0.",
   "date_published": "2026-10-08T21:38:07Z"
  },
  {
   "id": "tag:patchwire.jonathanross.dev,2026:CVE-2026-107716/disclosed",
   "url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/cve/CVE-2026-107716/",
   "title": "CVE-2026-107716 · masci banks · disclosed",
   "content_text": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. Prior to 2.5.1, Banks DirectoryPromptRegistry does not reject symbolic links for index.json or discovered and existing .jinja prompt files. In an application where untrusted users can influence a prompt directory, DirectoryPromptRegistry._scan() and DirectoryPromptRegistry.get() can follow a link outside the registry root and disclose a file, while DirectoryPromptRegistry.set(), DirectoryPromptRegistry._save(), and DirectoryPromptRegistry._load() can read or overwrite an external link target. The issue requires attacker influence over the registry directory or its extracted contents. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.1.",
   "date_published": "2026-10-08T21:33:13Z"
  },
  {
   "id": "tag:patchwire.jonathanross.dev,2026:CVE-2026-107716/fixed/pypi",
   "url": "https://patchwire.jonathanross.dev/cve/CVE-2026-107716/",
   "title": "CVE-2026-107716 · masci banks · fixed upstream (PyPI)",
   "content_text": "Fixed versions: banks 2.5.1.",
   "date_published": "2026-10-08T21:33:13Z"
  }
 ]
}